The Idaho Supreme Court recently affirmed a court’s award of damages for unjust enrichment. The case, Turcott v. Estate of Clarence D. Bates, concerned a woman and her husband who spent a substantial amount of time and money making improvements for the woman’s father with the assumption that the woman would inherit half of the father’s estate.
The father, however, changed his will and decided to leave nothing to his daughter. As a result, the daughter filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for the work that she performed. The district court subsequently determined that there was not any implied in fact contract between the woman and her father. The court, however, awarded damages under a theory of unjust enrichment.
This article takes a brief look at unjust enrichment claims in New York state as well as the various defenses that can be raised in response to these claims.
The post Turcott v. Estate of Clarence D. Bates: Unjust Enrichment and How to Avoid It appeared first on New York Estate Planning Lawyer Blog.